Energy Dissipation Problems Downstream of Jinnah Barrage

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jun 22, 2016

Main Article Content

Zulfiqar Ali Chaudhry

Abstract

Jinnah barrage is one of these barrages recommended by the Evaluation Consultants for rehabilitation and modernization works. Feasibility study for “Rehabilitation and Modernization of the Jinnah Barrage” noted that the hydraulic jump do not form over the glacis rather sweeps on the floor. The un-dissipated energy is causing damage to the impact blocks, the adjacent concrete floor and downstream loose stone apron. Feasibility consultants suggested curative measures, such as the construction of subsidiary weir at a distance of about 800ft downstream of the barrage and river training works upstream of the barrage. The finalization of rehabilitation works (either subsidiary weir or its alternative) is in progress and subsequently the detail design of the selected alternative will be carried out. The main focus in this study is to review previous studies/investigations, energy dissipation mechanism, river survey, sounding and probing data to establish the extent of damages and precisely the root cause for the damages.

Article Details

Issue
2008: Volume 3 July 2008
Section
Civil Engineering,Structures, Construction, Geo technology, Water, Transportation

References

Rock Characterization Testing and Monitoring, International Society for Rock Mechanics Suggested Methods, Ed. E.T. Brown, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1981.

Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Intact Rock Core Specimens, Soil and Rock, Building Stones, Annual Book of ASTM Standards 4.08., ASTM, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1984.

M. Fener, S. Kahraman, A. Bilgil and O. Gunaydin; Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Austria, (2005) 1-15.

D. V. D'Andrea, R. L. Fischer and D. E. Fogelson; US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Report of Investigations, 6702(1964)1-23.

E. Broch and J. Franklin; J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 9(6)(1972) 669-697.

Z. T. Bieniawski; Bulletin of Eng. Geol., 9(1)(1975) 1-11.

P. J. N. Pells; Aust Geomech, G5(N1)(1975) 54-56.

Suggested Methods for determining the Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Deformability of Rock Materials, Commission on Standardization of Laboratory and Field Tests, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech, 1979, Abstr., 16, 135-140, Reprinted in Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring – ISRM Suggested Methods, ed. E.T. Brown, Pergamon, Oxford, (1985) 111- 116.

F. P. Hassani, M. J. J. Scoble and B. N. Whittaker; In: Summers, D. A. (ed.) Proc. 21st US Symposium, Rock Mech., Rolla, Missouri, (1980) 543-553.

N. Brook; Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech, (22)(1985) 61-70.

J. S. Cargill and A. Shakoor; Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci & Geomech, (1990) 495- 503.

K. T. Chau and R. H. C. Wong, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., (1996,) 183-8.

J. Rusnak and C. Mark; 19th Ground Control Conference in Mining, West Virginia University, (2000) 362-371.

Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring, ISRM Suggested Methods, ed. E.T. Brown, Pergamon, Oxford, (1985)111-116.

M. Z. Abu Bakar; Correlation between Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Indirect Strength Indices of Rocks of Salt Range, MSc Thesis submitted to University of Engineering & Technology, Lahore, (2005).