Behaviour of Normal Concrete Us ing Superplasticizer under Different Curing Regimes

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jun 22, 2016

Main Article Content

S N R Shah
Muhammad Aslam
S A Shah
Raja Oad

Abstract

The performance of concrete primarily depends upon the type and ratio of its constituents,compaction, curing conditions and admixtures used during curing process. Part of this researchemphasis to calculate the consequences on strength of concrete when water-cement ratio is constantand the increase in slump occurs with the increase in amount of superplasticizer by percentage. Therest of the investigation is carried out to study the effects of superplasticizer with different dosagesunder different curing regimes at an ambient field temperature ranges between 45°C-50°C. For thispurpose, a concrete mix at 20MPa with all parameters constant was prepared by using an ASTM C494type A, and F, anionic melamine polycondensate non-toxic superplasticizer with no chlorides.Different dosages of superplasticizer were used in different batches of all 95 specimens, and curedunder different curing conditions and then tested for compressive and tensile strengths followingASTM standards. In all cases, the water curing up to 28 days testing showed maximum strength. Thehighest and lowest values of compressive strength were obtained with the addition of 0.5% and 1%superplasticizer respectively. It was found that without increasing the W/C ratio, the addition ofsuperplasticizer exhibits increase in strength.

Article Details

Issue
2014: Volume 15 JULY 2014
Section
Civil Engineering,Structures, Construction, Geo technology, Water, Transportation

References

G. De Matteis, (2005). "Effect of lightweight cladding panels on the seismic performance of moment resisting steel frames," Engineering structures, vol. 27, pp. 1662-1676.

S. Paul, et al., (2000) "State-of-the-art Review of Seismic Design of Steel Moment Resisting Frames–Part I: General Considerations and Stability Provisions," Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 27, pp. 23-32.

M. T. Naqash, et al., (2012) "Effects of capacity design rules on seismic performance of steel moment resisting frames," presented at the 15 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (WCEE), Lisbon Portugal.

T. Paulay and M. J. N. Priestley, (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings: Wiley Online Library.

V. Piluso, (1996) Theory and design of seismic resistant steel frames: Taylor & Francis.

M. T. Naqash, et al., (2012) "Seismic design of Steel Moment Resisting frames-European Versus American Practice," NED University Journal of Research, vol. Thematic Issue on Earthquake, pp. 45-59.

EN-1998-1, (2005) "Eurocode 8, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings," in European Committee for Standardization, CEN, ed. 36 B-1050, Brussels.

EN-1990, (2002) "Eurocode 0, Basis of structural design," in European Committee for Standardization, CEN, ed. 36 B-1050, Brussels.

EN-1991-1-1, (2004) "Eurocode 1, Actions on structures - Part 1-1: General actions - Densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings," in European Committee for Standardization, CEN, ed. 36 B-1050, Brussels.

COMFLOR 46. (2012). Composite floor decking. Available: http://www.comflor-uk.com

Computer and Structures Incorporation (CSI), (1978). "SAP 2000 Users Manual," ed. Berkeley, California, USA: Computer and Structures, Inc.,1978-2011.

P. FEMA-356, (2000) "Commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA-356," in Federal Emergency Management Agency, ed. Washington, DC.

M. T. Naqash, (2012) "Optimum design of Steel Moment Resisting Frames using Eurocode 8," Doctorate PhD Thesis, Department of Engineering and Geology (Ph.D. Thesis), University of Chiete and Pescara, Pescara.

M. T. Naqash, (2914) "Study on the fundamental period of vibration of steel moment resisting frames," BRCORP.